Silver Emulsion

Film Reviews

Uncle Jasper reviews: The Expendables (2010)

The Expendables (2010)

Starring Sylvester Stallone, Jason Statham, Jet Li, Dolph Lundgren, Randy Couture, Steve Austin, Terry Crews, Mickey Rourke, Bruce Willis

Directed By Sylvester Stallone

Oh no! It’s a new Hollywood Blockbuster! Jasper, you goddamned sellout. You soulless fink. Shouldn’t you be tooling along the lower rungs of the cinematic ladder? Shouldn’t you be rolling around in that piss-soaked cesspool digging up old, shitstained Lucha Libre movies nobody cares about? Or how about boring us to tears with yet another Shaw Bros kung fu film? Come on, it’s been four days now and you haven’t mentioned Chang Chieh or Chen Kuan-Tai… you’re losing your touch, bro.

Before you get all James Spader on my ass… bro, let me tell you that The Expendables pays tribute to the golden age of silly ass, testosterone-fused, over the top actioneers of the 80s in glorious fashion. Sure it’s stupid, loud, and full of more lapses in logic than a Bush presidency, but so were Commando, Delta Force, and Cobra. Those films defied their insipid plots and predictable formulas because they were fantastic action films featuring ripped motherfuckers who could actually dominate you in physical combat throwing around grenades and gunfire like it was rice at a wedding. None of these prancing, pencil-necked geeks who pass as action stars nowadays can even hold a candle to these meaty killing machines of the 80’s. The Expendables knows this and instead of going with some scrawny Hollywood cash-machine like Will Smith, decides to man up and bring old genre legends like Dolph Lundgren back to the screen as well as genuinely capable action stars like Jet Li.

Testosterone. This film is so crammed with the stuff, that I literally felt my gonads tripling in size during the course of its 108 minute running time. My man-hormones were bouncing around in a ricocheting frenzy like a ping pong ball stuck in a vacuum. Literally every 80’s genre staple makes an appearance here. You have kilos of dirty South American cocaine, giant machine guns capable of firing off 50,000 rounds in rapid succession without reloads, and your typical sleazy bureaucratic villain type, complete with an entire army of banana-republic guerrillas at his command. The film knows it is completely ridiculous and simply decides to roll with it. One liners, goofy villain monologues, and tough-guy machismo drip from every scene like sheets of napalm from a B-17 bomber. The younger crowd probably won’t get it, they’ll quickly dismiss it as dumb and then move onto Saw 3D or some similar-themed flavor of the month while us old timers will lean back in our seats while smiling and nodding affectionately.

I was a big fan of Stallone’s woefully underappreciated Rambo sequel of a few years back. I felt that the extreme carnage and over-the-top gore were exactly what the series needed for a serious jumpstart. I am happy to report that all of that crazy shit makes a triumphant return in The Expendables. Dudes are stabbed in the neck, arms are chopped off, high-caliber machine guns slice guys in two, and concussive grenade explosions vaporize heads into a fine red mist.

As with any of the older movies The Expendables draws its inspirations from, there are a lot of things you can bitch about with this film. It’s definitely overloaded with a lot of goofy baggage serving no real purpose other than to get your rocks off. Schwarzenegger’s unfunny cameo was pretty pointless, so much in fact, that it actually got in the way of my enjoyment of the film, as did Bruce Willis’. Also, as much as I love Mickey Rourke, did he really do anything… at all? I’m a big fan, but the scene with him and Stallone together, musing over old times played less like a moving scene about two men with many regrets in life, and more like a Botox advertisement. Don’t tell me you fuckers were thinking anything different either. It’s refreshing to see Jet Li thrown into the mix, but having Dolph Lundgren getting the drop on him, twice? Not gonna happen. Speaking of Jet Li, does any western filmmaker know how to film this guy? I’m sure Cory Yuen’s choreography was great. Too bad it was lost in a sea of shaky close-ups and frantic edits.

But in the end, who really cares? The nostalgia factor runs deep, and the man juice courses through every minute of screen time, making this crazy explosion-riddled romp stand up beyond virtually any attempt at criticism. This film knows exactly what it is. Don’t be a dick and flog it for wearing its inspirations on its sleeve, just sit back and drink the Kool-Aid.

It doesn’t take a genius to see that Stallone’s current obsessions are rooted in vanity. Besides the Botox injections and clinking vials of HGH, his last few films have served as entertaining, but self-serving attempts to defy his age at any cost while proving that his era of action is the only one that truly matters. With such a lofty goal as that I am surprised that he has continuously remained convincing in his argument. First Rocky Balboa, then Rambo, and now The Expendables. As far as Hollywood action films go, I don’t think anybody has been keeping it real like Stallone. Sure Michael Bay can make 37 edits in the span of twelve seconds of screen-time, but can he rip a man’s throat out with his bare hands? I didn’t think so.

[Editor’s note: So many badass men and their abundant testosterone is too much for one review to contain, so later on today I’ll post my own thoughts on Stallone’s latest. Enjoy!]

August 30, 2010 - Posted by | 2010s, Action, Movie Reviews, Uncle Jasper Reviews | , , , , , , , , , , ,


  1. I’m happy to see someone appreciate it for what it is instead of what it wasn’t. Are people really complaining about the ridiculous plot and bad acting? As you pointed out, none of the flicks this movie was paying homage to really had a great amount of depth. If people were hoping for Lethal Weapon or Die Hard, the thinking mans action flick, they were hoping for the wrong thing. I loved it for all it’s stupidity, and all the good and bad of it. It was mindless, glorious, escapism fun, and I couldn’t ask for much more than that.

    Comment by Heather | August 30, 2010 | Reply

    • I’m not the biggest fan of this movie. All I expected was some 80’s nostalgia magic but there was none in this movie. Sure, the acting, plot, editing were atrocious but I wouldn’t have minded, had it been have this 80’s retro feel we used to get with movies like Predator, Commando, Bloodsport, and what not.

      Comment by Castor | August 30, 2010 | Reply

    • Thank you! I think people who are slamming this film are really throwing criticism out where it doesn’t belong, or even worse, doesn’t matter. This film is too self-aware of it’s own inherent stupidity and cheesiness to even bother with those who criticize it for those very reasons.

      Also, I don’t know how more 80’s this film needs to be. Sure you can have the long hair, leg warmers, and White Lion soundtrack, but at that point it would cease to be a homage and become more of a self-parody. And then people would probably deride it for that!

      Comment by Uncle Jasper | August 30, 2010 | Reply

  2. It’s funny because I agree with you, but the editing and the CG were too much for me. Seriously, if it had been the same movie but physical FX and good editing, I’d be singing its praises. I do want to re-watch it on DVD because I think some of the shitty FX might not look so bad on TV.

    Comment by Will Silver | August 30, 2010 | Reply

    • Well, as you read in my review, I think we are in agreement with the editing. But shitty editing didn’t keep me from enjoying a film like 3 Dev Adam either. Coming from the world of old kung Fu films and zombie movies, CGI is obviously not a plus for me either. But I don’t know what to say… I just didn’t seem to mind it so much.
      It’s apples and oranges I guess. Like you mentioned before, we pretty much agree on a lot of points. I think the only difference is that you didn’t enjoy this film because of its flaws. I just happened to enjoy it despite them.

      Comment by Uncle Jasper | August 30, 2010 | Reply

      • hahahaha, yeah but the editing was better in 3 Dev Adam! If the “Cap fighting on a rope” scene had 100 cuts in it, I’d be bitching about that too. A lot of my frustration comes from the fact that the previous Rocky and Rambo films were not shot or edited like Expendables, so it really took me by surprise and pissed me off that he went a more modern route.

        Comment by Will Silver | August 30, 2010 | Reply

        • This is a movie about a bunch of buff dudes blowing shit up. Camera placement and shot composition were not the first things on my mind.
          Your CGI argument works, but I can’t criticize a film like this for not being aesthetically pleasing to the eye. I reserve that kind of criticism for the Citizen Kane’s and 2001’s of the world. This film is goofy trash… It’s ok for it to look a little rough.

          Comment by Uncle Jasper | August 30, 2010 | Reply

          • Yeah you got me here…I just would have liked it to be less rough.

            Comment by Will Silver | August 31, 2010

  3. I love your wordcraft but am not as hooked on testosterone as you. I haven’t seen this film yet – will probably just catch it on DVD. My heart sank when I read your comments about the editing of Corey Yuen’s choreography. This has happened too often in Western films.

    Comment by dangerousmeredith | August 31, 2010 | Reply

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: