Silver Emulsion

Film Reviews

Shock Corridor (1963)

Shock Corridor (1963)

Starring Peter Breck, Constance Towers, Gene Evans, James Best, Hari Rhodes, Larry Tucker, Paul Dubov, Chuck Roberson, Neyle Morrow, John Matthews, Bill Zuckert, John Craig, Philip Ahn

Directed by Samuel Fuller

Expectations: High. I’ve seen it before, about nine-ten years back, but now I like Sam Fuller a lot more.

I’ve previously stated my love for Samuel Fuller, so I won’t repeat myself here. I had seen this film about nine years back and I liked it at the time but it was the first Sam Fuller film I had seen and it was before I knew anything about him. After watching Shutter Island, I had a burning desire to re-watch Shock Corridor, another film dealing with mental hospitals. Scorsese is on record as being a huge fan of this film, so I figured at some level he was influenced to make Shutter Island out of his love for Shock Corridor. After re-watching this, I can’t say that there’s any specific connection between the two, but it did make for an interesting pair of very different films.

Fuller opens his film with a Euripides quote, “Whom God wishes to destroy, he first turns mad.” It’s a stark way to open a B-picture, but this is Sam Fuller we’re talking about and he is all about putting the truth in our faces and letting us squirm in our seats as we are confronted by it. It is interesting to consider this quote against each character and how they ended up in the mental hospital. The quote exemplifies everything Fuller is trying to say within the film, so unlike a lot of quotes at the beginning of stuff, this one has real weight and power behind it.

The film tells the story of a journalist, Johnny Barrett, who hopes to uncover the truth in an unsolved mental hospital murder and win a Pulitzer Prize with the resulting story. He trains himself to fool the doctors of the institution so that he can be admitted as a patient and observe from the inside. There were three witnesses to the crime and Johnny talks with each one over the course of the film. Each witness is a wonderful character, all played by great, unsung actors. Stuart, a man convinced he is a Confederate General, is played by James Best who was in tons of stuff, but I know him best from his work in a couple of Andy Griffith episodes. Hari Rhodes plays an African-American man who believes himself to be Grand Wizard of the KKK and displays a wonderful range and power in his performance. Finally, we have the excellent Gene Evans, star of many Fuller pictures, playing a genius who has reverted back to the mind of a child. These witnesses stand out as the highlights of the film. The setup of each questioning scene is a little too formulaic after you’ve seen one of them, but the scenes are all so good unto themselves that this can be forgiven.

On a surface level, this isn’t the greatest film. I prefer the other Sam Fuller films I’ve seen to this, but I still recognize how well done this is overall. Specifically, Fuller’s use of sound in the film is excellent. One scene involves a character singing opera in the middle of the night. At first we hear only his voice, the sound we would hear if we were in the room with him. The camera focuses on Johnny, we are hearing what he is hearing. As the camera moves up to show the patient singing, the sound of a full opera with orchestra fills the soundtrack. The patient bobs his head with the thunderous music. When we cut back to Johnny, the opera jarringly drops out of the soundtrack and we are left with the ambient audio of the room again. Fuller skillfully illustrates what is going on not only in the actual room, but also what the characters are hearing within their own minds. He uses this technique again later on, with equally pleasing results.

Without question there are some amazing moments and scenes contained here, but there’s also some stuff that is a bit boring and slow as well. Specifically, there’s a burlesque scene early on that seems completely unnecessary, but maybe I just missed the point. Shock Corridor is very well shot, but its B-movie roots will throw off a lot of viewers who are watching this simply because they heard it was great. One could argue though, that to only look at the surface of Shock Corridor would be missing the entire point of the film.

Fuller is known for his distinct political views and his uncanny skill for working social commentary and subtext into his scripts. The main character and each of the witnesses represent something greater than a man in a mental ward. Our main character, Johnny, is an enterprising young man looking only to increase his place in life by winning the Pulitzer Prize. He cares nothing for solving the murder, except for the success it can give him. This reckless pursuit of success ultimately means his downfall.

The three witnesses each represent a social problem afflicting the then current America. The sad thing about this is that forty-seven years later, the same problems are still evident in our society. The Euripides quote rings true throughout and Fuller’s underlying assertion that these insane problems afflicting America are harbingers of its destruction, is still a plausible and relevant thought. Like Dr. Strangelove, it is a testament to the power and truth contained in the film, but is ultimately very disappointing because as a society we haven’t moved any farther up the cultural ladder. Shock Corridor is not a film for everyone but it is a film that offers a lot to patient viewers. For me the film is greater after it is over, when I am left with only my fading memories and my thoughts on the haunting visions that Fuller has conjured up.

June 25, 2010 - Posted by | 1960s, Drama, Movie Reviews, Rating: 3 Stars | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,


  1. Fantastic review! You offer a great analysis and an interesting take on this film. It’s true that each of the characters are pretty much encapsulated versions of the larger social issues of the time, but the great thing about this movie is that it could also be enjoyed on a very bare-bones, base level as well. The crazy over the top moments are the most fun to me, even the trashy nympho scene.

    Comment by Uncle Jasper | June 27, 2010 | Reply

    • Thanks dude! I was sweating bullets trying to do it justice, so I’m glad that you enjoyed it. You’re right that it works on a surface level as well. The first time I watched it I didn’t get anything that was going on beneath the surface and I enjoyed it then. That trashy nympho scene is pretty trashy. It’s not one of my favorite moments but it is fun to watch. Man, the rain scene in the corridor is amazing though. Those images are burned into my psyche for all time. Good stuff.

      I should watch Naked Kiss again, I saw that around the same time I first saw this. I don’t remember a thing about it.

      Comment by Silver Emulsion | June 27, 2010 | Reply

      • Fuck it man, Naked Kiss is good, but Park Row is better. I mean, it may not be better than the Naked Kiss in a technical sense, but it definitely was closer to Sam Fuller’s heart than anything else I’ve seen of his, perhaps outside of the Big Red One. In fact, I would argue that those two films are the ones that really let me discover what Sam Fuller, the man, was all about. Which definitely, in turn fostered a deeper appreciation of his work

        Sorry for the wordy reply, but I have to say, I am really enjoying your reviews of Fuller’s work. He definitely stands at the very top of my favorite directors, and you seem to have really nailed the distinctiveness of his voice. you shouldn’t worry about doing these films justice, you are doing a great job.

        Comment by Uncle Jasper | June 28, 2010 | Reply

        • I haven’t seen Park Row yet. I’ll definitely be checking it out in the future. I’ve been watching a movie from him every couple of months with the goal of seeing them all. He’s really worthy of major praise but he always gets overlooked. Thanks for the kind words man!

          Comment by Silver Emulsion | June 28, 2010 | Reply

  2. I agree..excellent review. I amused myself by looking at the…murals on the wall in the nympho scene. That, and the striptease at the beginning, must have been in the trailer for this. I hope these things were simply added as selling points…and that’s why the striptease seems tacked on. If it had any meaning later on (and I hoped it would)…I didn’t see it.

    Here’s a link for you (I hope I remember this correctly…)
    Shock Corridor: “This isn’t a sanitorium. It’s a hospital.”
    Shutter Island: “This isn’t an asylum. It’s a hospital.”

    (I know, correctly it’s “sanitarium”…with an A, but that’s what the line is.)

    There is also a slight link, maybe coincidental in the titles.

    Comment by Laura | July 7, 2010 | Reply

    • Yeah you’re right, they both did have that similar line. I forgot about that.

      Comment by Silver Emulsion | July 7, 2010 | Reply

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: