Silver Emulsion

Film Reviews

The Lovely Bones (2009)


The Lovely Bones (2009)

Starring Saoirse Ronan, Mark Wahlberg, Rachel Weisz, Stanley Tucci, Susan Sarandon

Directed by Peter Jackson

Expectations: Moderate. I heard bad things, but I love Peter Jackson so there’s no way I’m not watching this.


This is a tough movie for me to review. Emotionally, I loved it. It hit me hard and continues to resonate in the days following. Technically, I have some issues with it. Ultimately, for me, the emotional weight of the movie is far greater than any technical problems I had, and I am judging it a bit harsher anyway because of my Peter Jackson fanboy status. I’ve seen every one of his films and I enjoy them all. Yes, I even like Meet the Feebles.

Set in 1973, the film tells the story of Susie Salmon, a fourteen-year-old girl who blissfully walks home one day with the prospect of her first kiss consuming her mind. Instead, her neighbor rapes and murders her. Her spirit leaves her body and she continues to look down on her family from the afterlife. With The Lovely Bones, Jackson returns to a smaller type of movie similar to his 1994 film, “Heavenly Creatures.” My problem with some of Jackson’s choices in filming this movie is that instead of being in “small movie mode,” he still seems like he’s in “big effects movie mode” having just come from Lord of the Rings and King Kong. There’s definitely a need for this kind of duality given the nature of the material here, but I think there are times when he misses the mark a bit. I found some of the digital afterlife sequences overstimulating, with way too much going on at once on-screen. I simply could not take in and process everything at times. As for things that worked, there are lots of HD video camera insert shots, hyper close-ups of fingers or objects. These were skillfully done to heighten the mood and increase tension and I enjoyed them a lot. There’s also a couple of model dollhouse shots that are real fun if you dig that sort of thing. Overall, the film worked for me and the problems I had were minor nitpicks.

Acting all around was very good. Rachel Weisz is easily the weakest link, but she’s not in it much. Mark Wahlberg’s performance surprised me. After Boogie Nights, I haven’t been able to watch him in any role without thinking of his character from that film, Dirk Diggler. He has a similar delivery to his lines in most movies (like The Departed) and it basically ruins those scenes for me. In the Lovely Bones, he actually made me forget about Boogie Nights, and for me that is huge. Stanley Tucci and Saoirse Ronan don’t disappoint either. Their scene together early in the film is one of the best, with Tucci oozing that slimy, pedophile vibe to counterbalance Ronan’s naïve, innocent girl.

I hope that this film finds its audience on DVD, because it really is a lot better than the critics make it sound. Without a doubt, it is a more satisfying film than some of last year’s Best Picture nominees. Thematically, this is the type of movie that is better suited to home viewing, so I guess it worked in the film’s favor to have flopped at the box office. Overall, a very well done, emotionally moving film. I loved it.

April 28, 2010 - Posted by | 2000s, Drama, Movie Reviews, Rating: 3 & 1/2 Stars | , , , , , , ,

6 Comments »

  1. Man can you put out the reviews. JPF

    Comment by jpfmovies | April 28, 2010 | Reply

    • haha, thanks. I try to keep a couple days ahead of myself so it makes posting new stuff every day pretty easy. Especially now with my buddy Uncle Jasper contributing some reviews. His next will be up tomorrow.

      Comment by silveremulsion | April 28, 2010 | Reply

  2. I’m sorry to agree with you my friend, but I just could not stand this movie after awhile. Although, I will give it credit for a good Tucci performance, and some lush visuals.

    Comment by CMrok93 | April 28, 2010 | Reply

    • No apologies necessary. I realize that I am going against the consensus here and my rating is based more on the emotional impact of the film for me than its technical merits. No doubt, it’s boring in spots and clumsy in others but for me, despite those problems, I really enjoyed it.

      Comment by silveremulsion | April 28, 2010 | Reply

  3. What this movie needed was somebody blowing up a sheep with a rocket launcher. Joking aside, I enjoyed Heavenly Creatures and this to a lesser degree. But damn, I just loves me some old-school Peter Jackson wackiness. Unfortunately, as much as I would love him to return to his roots, I just don’t see it happening anytime soon.

    Comment by Uncle Jasper | April 29, 2010 | Reply

    • hahahahahaha. Peter Jackson does need to return to the wackiness. Maybe after the Tintin movie, but like you said, I doubt it.

      Comment by silveremulsion | April 29, 2010 | Reply


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: